Murder is the intentional and premeditated taking of someone's life. Premeditation or premeditation is when a person, before committing an offense, had the opportunity to reflect on that offense, but then committed it anyway.
The legislator has chosen not to define the concept. The premeditation is believed to be present when the prior decision was made, considered and finalized. Forethought is an aggravating (personal) circumstance
Ivermectin wins in court again: for human rights
One dose € 1,66 Ivermectin was enough to get 81-year-old John Swanson off the ventilator. John's wife Sandra couldn't believe it. His story is remarkably similar to other cases of patients on their way with advanced COVID-19, but who were saved when Ivermectin was added.
Ralph Lorigo is the attorney who has now won three court orders forcing New York hospitals to administer Ivermectin to dying patients. Incredibly, these three hospitals and their lawyers fought the patients, arguing that they had no right to receive the drug despite a valid prescription from their doctors. Essentially, the argument was that they had no right to try a potentially life-saving drug.
In each of the three cases, the New York State Supreme Court justices sided with the patient, and in each of the three cases, the patients recovered almost miraculously after the Ivermectin was administered. In all cases, these patients were in the intensive care unit with ventilation equipment, were unable to breathe on their own, and generally, after the drug was given, they quickly improved and were able to breathe on their own.
pay attention! the image above is not a movie 😉
Judith Smentkiewicz made national news in January when her family hired Lorigo after the hospital refused a fourth dose of Ivermectin. Smentkiewicz's son and daughter called Ivermectin a “panacea” in court documents. Lawyer Lorigo and his associate Jon F. Minear reported, “This lady was on a ventilator, literally on her deathbed, before receiving this drug. As far as we are concerned, the judge's order saved this woman's life. “
Glenna “Sue” Dickinson's family happened to see a newspaper article of Judith's remarkable story, and they decided to try Ivermectin as well.
Sue Dickinson, 65, received COVID-19 on January 7, 2021. She suffered progressive deterioration and was admitted to Rochester General Hospital on January 12. She continued to deteriorate and was placed on a ventilator on January 17. The hospital staff told her that her survival rates were about 40 percent.
With nothing to lose, Natalie Kingdollar, Dickinson's daughter, contacted their primary care physician, Tom Madejski, who wrote the prescription. The hospital refused to give Sue the Ivermectin. Lorigo and Minear's legal team prepared an affidavit of Dr. Madejski and requested a court order. Supreme Court Judge Frank Caruso ordered the hospital to provide the Ivermectin.
Dickinson, like Swanson, and Smentkiewicz, came off the fan and also improved. The family reported on Facebook, "She is making progress every day, and it is Ivermectin and God that makes this possible." She has since been released from hospital.
Ivermectin is widely used by doctors as there are now 51 studies from around the world, 50 of which show a clear benefit and one neutral. However, the only study that showed a neutral effect was roundly criticized as flawed in one open letter signed by a group of 120 doctors.
Experts around the world have called for the global and systematic use of Ivermectin to prevent and treat COVID-19. Doctors have recently written about a for-profit regulatory agency and Big Pharma to block cheap, safe and effective treatments like Ivermectin and HCQ in favor of experimental and perhaps more dangerous and arguably less effective vaccines and drugs like Remdesivir. Since Remdesivir costs $ 3.100 per dose and does not reduce the number of deaths, choosing Ivermectin is a good idea, many doctors say.
Ivermectin costs about $ 2 = € 1,66 per dose. It's safer than Tylenol or most vitamins, says Dr. Pierre Kory of the FLCCC Alliance, a group of expert physicians who promote access and information through a nonprofit. Dr. Kory and Mr. Lorigo team up to help other hospital patients access the life-saving drug.
Dr. Fred Wagshul, a Yale trained physician, is a pulmonologist and directs the Lung Center of America. He is also a founder of the FLCCC Alliance. Dr. Wagshul notes that the typical dose for hospital patients is 0,3 mg of Ivermectin per kg of body weight for four days, which equates to nine 3 mg tablets per day for four days in a typical 200 pound patient.
Dr. George Fareed, a former Harvard professor, advocates combination therapy of Ivermectin with HCQ in outpatient cases. For the benefit of physician readers, the specific doses are used up given this link .
The big problem is that information promoting Ivermectin is often censored or silenced as quickly as it is provided. Facebook, Reddit, Change.org , YouTube, and others recently removed posts about Ivermectin citing violations of “community standards”.
Spreading disinformation to remove real information is also a tactic.
Physicians using common sense and scientific studies are considered offenders, as are those who publish factual accounts of Ivermectin-based recovery stories. A recent article exposed the link between large pharmaceutical companies and government regulatory agencies that have financial entanglements and massive conflicts of interest.
The disinformation campaign is evident in the publication of articles attempting to fake Ivermectin, referring to an “animal dewormer” that could be a “bad idea” for humans to use. In reality, many drugs are common for treatment in both humans and animals, including antibiotics, antifungals, and antiparasitics.
Ampicillin, a form of penicillin, is widely used to treat childhood infections such as whooping cough, salmonella and meningitis. It is routinely used to treat adults for bronchitis, pneumonia, and rheumatic heart disease. It is also consistently used in veterinary applications to treat calves, cattle, dogs and cats.
You would never see an article trying to smear Ampicillin as a veterinary drug and warn people not to use it. However, we see this propaganda daily trying to influence the general public against Ivermectin, a life-saving drug that has been prescribed safely and in billions of doses for parasitic diseases for the past 40 years.
Dr. Satoshi Omura won the Nobel Prize in Medicine in 2015 for his discoveries that led to the development of Ivermectin. In praising Ivermectin and its potential to help with the COVID-19 pandemic, compared dr. Omura recently Ivermectin with Penicillin , “One of the greatest discoveries of the twentieth century”.
Currently, Ivermectin is already used by 25 percent of the countries in the world to prevent and treat COVID-19. Bangladesh, where Ivermectin is widely used in almost every home, has a 99% lower per capita death rate from COVID-19 than in the US. Bangladesh, with a population of 160 million, has half of the US population. However, it only has 10.000 COVID-19 deaths. Compare that to nearly 580.000 American deaths in our country of 327 million.
However, censorship, corruption, hospital lawyers and disinformation campaigns continued to hinder its wide acceptance in the United States. Many have never heard of it.
Ivermectin recently won court in South Africa after a lengthy legal battle. Ralph Lorigo has now won his third State Supreme Court Injunction in New York. Are legal strategies also needed in the US to get FDA approval for Ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19?
Dr. Tess Lawrie has gotten into this battle between David and Goliath. She is an independent research consultant for WHO and her work has been consistently used to support the International Clinic Practice Guidelines. In other words, she has been one of the foremost scientists on which WHO bases their recommendations.
She has founded a non-profit organization to promote the worldwide approval and adoption of Ivermectin for COVID-19. She asks for support through this video.
We owe it to ourselves as humans to support this work. We owe it to future generations who need medical truth, not corruption, to guide our public health policy. We owe it to the principle of basic human rights.
Justus R. Hope, MD