Sincerely Independent News & Opinions

Keep us in the air to fight for freedom

Could it be that everything is lied?

Share our articles and break the censorship

Everything is a lie

All lies

It's all lies


The Corman-Droste document is the basis of all the corona woes we find ourselves in. This is an official document prepared by a number of virologists and pcr test manufacturers recommending the use of a pcr test for something that the test is not intended for. In this document the specifications of the pcr test are laid down in order to be able to detect the sars-cov-2 virus. Or so it is claimed.

There are many bizarre details about this pcr test and how it came about. But one of the most bizarre details is that during the submission of this paper to Eurosurveillance on January 23, 2020 (yes, you read it right, before the pandemic) and the approval on January 24, 2020 (yes, you read it right again) ) it was described that the 'virus' that should be detected with this pcr test was not found.

The virus was not there, but the test to detect the virus was there.

A bit strange right?

See here the two most remarkable sentences in the 'Corman Droste paper':

We report here on the establishment and validation of a diagnostic workflow for 2019-nCoV screening and specific confirmation, designed in absence of available virus isolates or original patient specimens.

(We report here on how to set up and validate a diagnostic workflow for 2019-nCoV screening and specific confirmation designed in the absence of available virus isolates or original patient specimens)


Before public release of virus sequences from cases of 2019-nCoV, we relied on social media reports announcing detection of a SARS-like virus. We thus assumed that a SARS-related CoV is involved in the outbreak.

(Before virus sequences from 2019-nCoV cases were made public, we relied on social media reports announcing the detection of a SARS-like virus, so we assumed that a SARS-related CoV was involved in the outbreak)


Let the absurdity of this affect you for a moment. They have come up with a diagnosis for a virus that they have not been able to find, but they have based it on the stories they came across on social media. In other words:

Dr. Facebook has been the source of inspiration for these pseudo-scientists.

Very strange, right?

If you want to read the whole monstrosity:


We are now a year and a few months on. A group of international scientists completely undercut the validity of the 'Corman-Droste paper' in October last year. Scientifically built on quicksand and fabrications, was their conclusion in a nutshell.

Common Sense has a nice readable article devoted to it:

Unfortunately, the retraction paper (a document submitted by the group of real scientists to have the previous document declared invalid) is rejected by Eurosurveillance. The motivation: it is not too bad with the conflict of interest, we have good internal control and good guidelines and we have also asked a few people (?) To take a look at it. They have looked at it for a few hours and reported to us that there is nothing wrong with the Corman Drost paper.

In short, this is what Eurosurveillance's response comes down to. No substantive response

A bit strange right?


A prize of 225.000 euros had already been awarded (and I read that it has recently been increased to a prize of 1 million euros) for the virologist / biochemist / scientist who can prove the existence of the virus. The prize is not claimed. By no one. The virus still doesn't exist. Where do you stay osterhaus, you are so crazy about money. Come on, show the virus !!! But it is not happening. A bit strange right?

Koopmans recently traveled to China again to find the virus. Unfortunately also returned empty-handed. A bit strange right?

Pathologists who, contrary to WHO advice, nevertheless autopsied the bodies of Covid-19 victims have never been able to identify Covid-19 as the cause of death. Kind of strange, right?

In my column 'No one understands that', from November last year, I already wrote that the influenza virus, which has existed for more than 500 years, has suddenly disappeared with the arrival of the sars-cov-2 virus. And that the flu no longer exists since the arrival of covid-19.

In that column I wondered at the time whether it could be possible that they are lying and cheating so outrageously that the old flu is now simply being packaged in a new jacket and that a panic and fear culture is created around it.

No, they couldn't be that bad ...


However, it is increasingly starting to seem that it is indeed that bad. The UK Department of Health recently admitted that no one demonstrably died of Covid-19 in UK hospitals. Official statement !!! See my column 'How many covid-19 deaths are there actually really'.


Governments base their devastating oppressive policies on PCR tests that are flawed by no means. Made to prove a virus that doesn't exist at all. Very bizarre, right?

The pharmaceutical industry can conjure up various vaccines in no time, with revolutionary new techniques, without detecting a virus. Very bizarre, right?

But people still get sick, people still die, you will now say.

Yes that's right. It is, it was and it always will be.

Imagine that during a flu season, such as the 2018/2019 flu season, the government and the media would meet every day and report on how many people had the flu, how many people needed to see the doctor, how many people were in hospitals were admitted, how dramatic the situation in the hospitals was, how many people died of the flu .....

Then you would have had an even greater panic than we have now.


Could the whole covid-19 story really be a lie?

Yes, that's possible. And yes, it probably is.

Read the findings from Dr. Knauss agrees:

Dr. Derek Knauss is a clinical laboratory specialist focusing on virology and immunology. He is based in Southern California. He has a PhD in Virology and Immunology and is a clinical laboratory scientist.

Dr. Knauss tested 1500 positive Covid-19 samples collected in California. He reported on this for the first time in December last year. He was ignored but did not give up. He is now suing the CDC (Center for Disease Control) in America.

This is his statement:


When my lab team and I performed the tests using Koch's postulates and observation under a scanning electron microscope (SEM), we found NO Covid in any of the 1500 samples.

What we found was that all 1500 samples were mainly Influenza A and some were Influenza B, but not a single case of Covid, and we did not use the BS PCR test.

We then sent the rest of the samples to Stanford, Cornell and a few University of California labs and they found the same results as us, NO COVID. They found influenza A and B.

We all spoke to the CDC at the time and asked for viable Covid samples, but the CDC said they could not provide them because they had no samples.

The flu was called "Covid" and most of the 225.000 deaths were dead from comorbidities such as heart disease, cancer, diabetes, emphysema, etc. Then they got the flu that further weakened their immune systems and died.

I have not yet found a single viable sample of Covid-19 to work with. We of the 7 universities that did the lab tests on these 1500 samples are now suing the CDC for fraud with Covid-19. The CDC has not yet sent us a single viable, isolated, and purified sample of Covid-19. If they can't or won't send us a viable monster I'm saying there's no Covid-19, it's fictional.

The four research reports describing the genomic extracts of the Covid-19 virus never succeeded in isolating and purifying the samples. All four articles on Covid-19 describe only small pieces of RNA that were only 37 to 40 base pairs long, which is NOT a VIRUS. A viral genome is usually 30.000 to 40.000 base pairs in length.

If Covid is believed to be so serious, how come no one in a lab has ever isolated and purified this virus in its entirety? That's because they never actually found the virus, all they ever found was tiny pieces of RNA that were never identified as the virus.

So what we're dealing with is just another flu strain like every year.

Covid-19 does not exist and is fictitious.


Why, that is the question we should be concerned with. Don't assume that governments in principle want the best for us. Just look a little bit in the history, including recent ones, and you will soon find out that the opposite is rather true.

Great world suffering has always been done to us by governments. There have never been peaceful citizens who have asked for war, exclusion, dictatorships, violence, genocide. We peaceful citizens are only victims.

How are we ever going to get out of this trap of trickery and deceit?

Killing Fields, Phnom Penh, Cambodia


Share our articles and break the censorship

Share this article!

Subscribe now
Subscribe to
May be your real name or a pseudonym
Not required
newest most voted
Inline feedback
See all comments
nl Dutch
What is your response to this?x