Documents prove Fauci collaborated with the Communist Party on COVID data
Judicial Watch, a Civic Regulators group that files freedom of information lawsuits, released a press statement Monday about their investigation that correspondence from Dr. Anthony Fauci demonstrate that he cooperated with Chinese Communist Party and relevant demands of COVID restrictions for America.
"These new emails show the special collaboration of WHO and Fauci along with China's efforts to monitor information on COVID-19," said Tom Fitton, president of Judicial Watch.
From their press release:
Judicial Watch announced today that it and the Daily Caller News Foundation (DCNF) 301 pages with emails and other data from Dr. Anthony Fauci and Dr. H. Clifford Lane from the United States Department of Health and Human Services, stating that National Institutes of Health (NIH) officials aligned confidentiality forms with China's terms and that in January 2020 the World Health Organization (WHO) had not yet issued a released “strictly confidential” epidemiological COVID-19 analysis.
In addition, the emails reveal an independent journalist in China pointing out the inconsistent COVID numbers in China to the deputy director of NIH's National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Cliff Lane, for clinical research and special projects .
The emails were obtained in response to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit filed in the US District Court for the District of Columbia by Judicial Watch on behalf of the DCNF ( Daily Caller News Foundation v. US Department of Health and Human Services (No. 1: 20-cv-01149)).
The lawsuit was filed after HHS failed to respond to the DCNF's April 1, 2020 request from FOIA to:
- Communication between Dr. Fauci and Deputy Director Lane and World Health Organization officials on the novel coronavirus.
- Communications from Dr. Fauci and Deputy Director Lane on WHO, WHO official Bruce Aylward, WHO Director General Tedros Anhanom and China.
The new emails contain a conversation on confidentiality forms on February 14-15, 2020 between Lane and Technical Mansuk Daniel Han employee of the WHO . Han writes: "This time the forms are tailored to the Chinese conditions, so we cannot use the forms from the past."
A WHO briefing package sent on February 13, 2020 to NIH officials traveling to China as part of the COVID response, asks the officials to hold off on sharing information until they have an agreement with China: “IMPORTANT: Treat this as sensitive and not for public communications until we agree on communications with China. ”
In an e-mail On January 20, 2020, a WHO official discusses the epidemiological analysis they conducted earlier that month of COVID-19, saying it is “strictly confidential” and “only for” the Strategic and Technical Advisory Group for Infection Hazards. (STAG-IH), and "may not be redistributed."
In an e-mail March 4, 2020 Chinese journalist Zeng Jia points to Lane, a reporter from Caixin Media , to Fauci deputy Cliff Lane that the number of cases reported in the WHO Joint China Mission's rapport inconsistent with the number the Wuhan Public Health Committee:
Page 6 [in the WHO report] states that there was at least one clinically diagnosed case of coronavirus in Wuhan on December 2, 2019; and from Jan 11-17 there were new clinically diagnosed and confirmed cases in Wuhan every day, which is inconsistent with Wuhan Public Health Committee figures.
In an e-mail from February 15, 2020 Gauden Galea informs , head of the WHO office in China, members of the joint mission who travel to China insist that all their activities in China would be regulated by the Chinese government's National Health Commission.
“These emails set the tone early on during the coronavirus outbreak. It is clear that the WHO has put China in control of the flow of information from the start. True transparency is key, ”said Ethan Barton, editor-in-chief of the Daily Caller News Foundation.
“These new emails show the WHO and Fauci's special adjustments to China's communist efforts to monitor information on COVID-19,” said Tom Fitton, president of Judicial Watch.
This is the latest information obtained from Judicial Watch and the DCNF's ongoing investigation into Fauci and NIH's response to the coronavirus pandemic. Judicial Watch and the DCNF have previously emails discovered in which a WHO entity insisted on a press release approved by Dr. Fauci, "mainly" in support of China's COVID-19 response.
On September 22, Judge Dabney L. Friedrich of the US District Court passed HHS order to start processing responsive records. In a Sept. 21 lawsuit, HHS said the agency could begin producing 300 pages of responsive records for the DCNF starting Nov. 30, eight months after receiving the daily caller's FOIA request. The total number of responsive records is approximately 4.200, which would have delayed full release of the data until at least 2022. HHS also claimed that Fauci must personally review each of his emails before they are released.
If there were any errors in the translation message above, I apologize.
Share and like as much as possible! This is how we break through censorship together!